1. Do not share user accounts! Any account that is shared by another person will be blocked and closed. This means: we will close not only the account that is shared, but also the main account of the user who uses another person's account. We have the ability to detect account sharing, so please do not try to cheat the system. This action will take place on 04/18/2023. Read all forum rules.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. For downloading SimTools plugins you need a Download Package. Get it with virtual coins that you receive for forum activity or Buy Download Package - We have a zero Spam tolerance so read our forum rules first.

    Buy Now a Download Plan!
  3. Do not try to cheat our system and do not post an unnecessary amount of useless posts only to earn credits here. We have a zero spam tolerance policy and this will cause a ban of your user account. Otherwise we wish you a pleasant stay here! Read the forum rules
  4. We have a few rules which you need to read and accept before posting anything here! Following these rules will keep the forum clean and your stay pleasant. Do not follow these rules can lead to permanent exclusion from this website: Read the forum rules.
    Are you a company? Read our company rules
Shared accounts will be removed Plugin Downloads Zero spam policy Forum Rules

Question Will this over-stress an SCN5?

Discussion in 'Motor actuators and drivers' started by HI_iam_new, Oct 23, 2021.

  1. HI_iam_new

    HI_iam_new 0dof

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2021
    Messages:
    22
    Balance:
    128Coins
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Hello all.

    I am considering utilizing an SCN5 for a traction loss setup, and I've arrived at a roadblock in the form of mounting an SCN5.


    The typical SCN5 setups involve rod-ends at the front and rear, like this: [​IMG]

    The setup I am considering is limited by the available space, and so I've thought of utilizing foot-mount angle-brackets to rigidly mount the SCN5 to a piece of 8020 extruded aluminum profile. The shaft will have a rod-end screwed onto it.

    Here is a picture of the foot-mount angle bracket (attached to the SCN5): [​IMG]


    My question is this: As long as I maintain parallel motion with the shaft, as well as ensuring that rotation only occurs around its one free axis, will a single rod-end be sufficient to avoid over-stressing the SCN5?

    Thank you.
    HI_iam_new, Oct 23, 2021
    #1
  2. HI_iam_new

    HI_iam_new 0dof

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2021
    Messages:
    22
    Balance:
    128Coins
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0
    Sorry for double-posting, but I cannot find the edit function to correct my previous post.

    I've now realized there is a functional difference between a rod-end (or heim joint) and a ball joint (which is found in the first photo). My original intention was to use a heim joint, but I've now decided to use a ball joint instead. However, the basis of the question remains the same: would a single ball joint provide enough flexibility to avoid over-stressing a rigidly mounted SCN5?

    I'd think that it would be okay, but I'm unfamiliar with engineering terms & principles (exhibit A: my rod-end, ball joint mix-up, haha), and am seeking some reassurance to ease my mind.

    Thanks again.
    HI_iam_new, Oct 23, 2021
    #2
  3. noorbeast

    noorbeast VR Tassie Devil Staff Member Moderator Race Director

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2014
    Messages:
    21,157
    Occupation:
    Innovative tech specialist for NGOs
    Location:
    St Helens, Tasmania, Australia
    Balance:
    148,628Coins
    Ratings:
    +10,909 / 54 / -2
    My Motion Simulator:
    3DOF, DC motor, JRK
    New member have some limitation, to discourage spamming: https://www.xsimulator.net/communit...ed-posts-needed-before-links-can-be-used.150/

    Other members have used SCNs for traction loss, use the Enhanced Google Search box on the recent page to find and check them out.

    A tie rod end should be fine, as it can rotate freely in the plane relative to what it is pushing or pulling.
    • Useful Useful x 1
    noorbeast, Oct 23, 2021
    #3