3DOF - C1500´s first Sim Seat

Hi

The problem with the wheel is solved.
1. my STM32 DISCO KIT is dead. No idea how i made it, but >2A current is definitely to much for the F408 *lol* a new smaller kit cost me only 12€ and thanks to @Hoantv i can use the internal DAC
2. I had to calibrate Pn190
here is a good description: https://github.com/hoantv/CarSimula...Drive-Parameter-Configuration-and-Calibration

More will come later.
@all: STAY HEALTHY !

Hi Folks

Maybe you have seen my FS2 Test disaster.
So i am still in debug mode

After printing the broken parts the printer is still busy.
I want to get rid of the EMI sound.
so this is what i made:

This was the initial situation:

Only one EMI filter in the left top corner

So Amazon delivered this:

six 25A EMI filters

And i printed a little bit:


after a major rewire it now looks like this:


EMI Test will follow later.

Regards
Peer

Where?

Hi Thanos
I meant the crash I talked about in this thread: https://www.xsimulator.net/community/threads/mover-and-aerofly-fs2-questions.15526/#post-215630

Do you have a link or a specific name for these filters that you got on amazon? thank you

Next step in EMI-Wars

Every line to the motor gets a ferrit ring for filtering

So the first 18 ferrit are assembled

All power cables to the motor are shielded from the beginning of the project.
The shield is connected to the coolingplate at the same point as the earth contact of the power-input-line.

If this does not help, i have no more ideas

Test and results will follow

May the EMI force be with me *lol*

@dedraro I bought this one:
--https://www.amazon.de/Filterplatine-Hochfrequenz-Zweistufige-Stromversorgung-Tiefpassfilterplatine/dp/B07TQ9PCPF/ref=sr_1_14?__mk_de_DE=%C3%85M%C3%85%C5%BD%C3%95%C3%91&dchild=1&keywords=emi+filter+25a&qid=1620154601&sr=8-14

Hi Folks

Sorry, i forgot the detailed pictures of the ferrit
Here they come:


An there is a new question.
What is the worst case position for a 6DOF rig and the front arm for the pedals?
After my last crash I´m a bit worried about a possible next crash.
So I wanted to test the maximum.
Is it right, that it is the worst case, if only one of the motors 3 or 4 (the motors on the back side) are on maximal position, and all other 5 motors are in lowes position?
I´ve tried to move in this position manually but i cant reach maximum.
The plate with the pedals get in contact with the aluminium tube just like in last crash.
it looks like this:


I will cut the frame on the blue lines and will test it again


Then the arm should have enough place to move in the worst case position.
This should prevent me from the same crash again

What do you think?

cheers
Peer

You simply reduce your rig movement so it doesn't append again.
Reduce the range of the actuators.

Pierre.

Sorry Pierre, but:
NO !
NO !
NO !
That is NO solution !! *lol*

I had only 22cm complete movement when I made the last pictures.

So I cut a bit an it looks like this now:

In this position motor 4 is moved to 39cm and all others are at 0cm
So I think this is my absolute worst case.
The software-limit is set to 38cm.

But now I have to stabilize the pedals because the frame underneath is missing.

Now i feel a bit saver for the next testruns.

But sill in debug mode

cheers
Peer

Something is wrong on your geometry. Can you post some photos of the whole platform?

The cockpit can be recessed in the top triangle, but not too much that the pedals footrest will have change to hit the actuators body...

LOL

Hi folks

After printing the broken parts and reassemble it, I recognized another unknown sound while moving the rig manually.
The Problem was found really fast. Another broken Part in the left-back actuators.

The lower ball-bearing-holder was broker.
While disassembling the actuators I found also a loosen screw witch normally holds the ball-screw in the ball-bearing.

Now everything seems OK

Hi @Thanos

Here are some pictures of the rig.
Unfortunately I did not get to clean up yet




What do you think?
Is there a big mistake in the geometry?

Can you please also confirm my settings in AMC:

Code:

Number of MOtors
<1-7axis>: 6axis

Platform Check
OFF - Normal

Park Position
<0-100%>:0/5

Standby POS/SPD
<0-100%>:50/5

Auto-Park Actuat
>All Axis Normal

Stroke All
Stroke: 360mm

Landscrew All
Size:  5mm/rev

Direction All
Dir:Inline

Ratio All
Reduction: 1:1

PulseReq:200kHz
Pulse Filter: 3

Pulse Freq
0-30:0, 200kHz

Function of KLM
1. Park/STBY SW

Function of FSW
2.Park motors

Button Speed
rate:40

S-ON Pin Level
Active Low (0v)

Spike Filter
Level 32512, ON

Spike Filter
range--> 64770

Spike Filt Level
->32512 178.5mm

Spike Filter
--> Enabled

Spike Filt Speed
Esc=24, Fine=11

Spike Filt Speed
Fine Move = 11

Rotation Offset
Default degrees

AMC-AASD14 v2.11
Beta:  fix5

Thanks in advace
Peer