1. Do not share user accounts! Any account that is shared by another person will be blocked and closed. This means: we will close not only the account that is shared, but also the main account of the user who uses another person's account. We have the ability to detect account sharing, so please do not try to cheat the system. This action will take place on 04/18/2023. Read all forum rules.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. For downloading SimTools plugins you need a Download Package. Get it with virtual coins that you receive for forum activity or Buy Download Package - We have a zero Spam tolerance so read our forum rules first.

    Buy Now a Download Plan!
  3. Do not try to cheat our system and do not post an unnecessary amount of useless posts only to earn credits here. We have a zero spam tolerance policy and this will cause a ban of your user account. Otherwise we wish you a pleasant stay here! Read the forum rules
  4. We have a few rules which you need to read and accept before posting anything here! Following these rules will keep the forum clean and your stay pleasant. Do not follow these rules can lead to permanent exclusion from this website: Read the forum rules.
    Are you a company? Read our company rules

2DOF motion simulator with a rotation axis

Discussion in 'DIY Motion Simulator Projects' started by degrancanaria, Apr 11, 2009.

  1. degrancanaria

    degrancanaria Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31
    Balance:
    9Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Hello Mike,

    Thanks,

    In a 2DOF motion simulator, your weigh is on the ball-and-socket joint (pivot), and SCN5 actuators move the seat. Therefore, SCN5 do not move the whole weigh. However, the third actuator has to move the whole structure (structure weigh and your weigh), about 140 / 150 Kg. I have not tested it with SCN5 but I think that it is heavy for them.
    SCN6 goes right for me, although it is more expensive. I recommend SCN6 actuator for 3rd axis (in similar setup like us)


    Regards,
    David
  2. ledfoot

    ledfoot Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    369
    Occupation:
    IT Manager
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Balance:
    22Coins
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0
  3. bvillersjr

    bvillersjr Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,174
    Location:
    Ohio, USA
    Balance:
    437Coins
    Ratings:
    +23 / 1 / -0

    I can't speak to degrancanaria's design and what actuator it takes to move it, but the SimXperience design allows the lower cost SCN5 to move the simulator with relative ease. With the actuator detached, I can move the Yaw axis with just 1 finger. There are some deep zoom photos off of the home page that you can view to get an understanding of the design.

    BTW- I haven't forgotten about getting those profiles released. I'm going to spend some time in the seat today.

    @degrancanaria - Very nice simulator. Which SCN6 did you use?

    :cheers:
  4. ledfoot

    ledfoot Member

    Joined:
    Sep 9, 2009
    Messages:
    369
    Occupation:
    IT Manager
    Location:
    Toronto, Canada
    Balance:
    22Coins
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0
    Thanks Bernard,

    Your design does seem a bit lighter than degrancanaria's design which is probably why his design works best with the SCN6 instead.

    Thanks. I look forward to trying them out.

    ....Mike
  5. degrancanaria

    degrancanaria Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31
    Balance:
    9Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Hi,
    Mike, I use SCN6 100mm 20 Kgf. The SCN5 are 100mm 10 kgf
    I also I look forward to trying them out.

    Yes, I think that our design is more heavy than Mike's design. Perhaps, a SCN5 can go well if the design was lighter.

    Regards,
    David
  6. bevins

    bevins New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2009
    Messages:
    5
    Balance:
    0Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Hey degrancanaria,

    Nice Sim. Howz it running now? I am thinking of building one off your design. Whats the length of yours and how is the SCN5's holding out. I amthinking of using three SCN6's.

    Got any more pics? Maybe some closeups of how its built?
  7. degrancanaria

    degrancanaria Member

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    31
    Balance:
    9Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Hi all,

    after many hours playing we have a new evolution or improvement to our simulator.
    We have built a DIY Pedals based on Todd Cannon system. The brake pedal is more realistic, we get more feeling... :highfive:

    IMAGE1_387.jpg

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bSZsWMQPW6Y

    Bevins, up to now the SCN5s are right. Perhaps SCN6 actuators could be better because our structure is heavy but we bought the SCN5 before making the structure. It is about 2 meters long by 1.5 meters wide.

    Regads,
    David
  8. egoexpress

    egoexpress Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,839
    Location:
    Germany - Frankfurt/M
    Balance:
    421Coins
    Ratings:
    +10 / 1 / -0
    Looks pretty professional! Good job!

    Regards
  9. REPLICAF10

    REPLICAF10 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2010
    Messages:
    1
    Balance:
    0Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    TIO, QUE FLIPE DE TRABAJO!!! Dude, what a fabulous job!!! Congratulations!!!
  10. BartS

    BartS Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2010
    Messages:
    156
    Balance:
    417Coins
    Ratings:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    This is really good.
    It looks like it gives great feedback to the driver and it shows in your driving that drift round the left hander.

    Well done a brilliant sim and one for the top 10 on X-Sim, we need a voting poll I think or a top 10 of rated sims.

    I can only hope to acheive a better driver experience with my sim build.

    A drift axis would add 4dof to my sim but 3DOF with heave is my primary mission right now, I am future proofing a 6DOF.

    Thanks Bart
  11. poteroa

    poteroa New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2012
    Messages:
    20
    Occupation:
    Service Technician
    Location:
    Finland
    Balance:
    0Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Awesome packet, I have to have one of these!
    I think I try to go with wipermotors to handle the yaw (2 in parallel).
    Weird that I just saw this thread for the first time, and had exactly the same idea how to do it after Bernards topic about it.. =)

    Just awesome, congratulations!

    btw, what game were you playing in that last video?
  12. TPS

    TPS Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    72
    Occupation:
    Business coach
    Location:
    Lodz/Poland
    Balance:
    439Coins
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0
    My Motion Simulator:
    2DOF, SCN5
    I know this thread is old but I got a question if x-sim software is able to handle third actuator in rear traction loss mode properly?

    Tom
  13. Henning Piez

    Henning Piez Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    110
    Location:
    Stuttgart
    Balance:
    17Coins
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    I never tested it, but it should work , either. Perhaps someone from the xsim experienced ones could help?
  14. bsft

    bsft

    Balance:
    Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Huh? How do you explain the movement in your own sim which has a drift frame on it then?
  15. Henning Piez

    Henning Piez Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    110
    Location:
    Stuttgart
    Balance:
    17Coins
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0
    AW: 2DOF motion simulator with a rotation axis

    I don 't use xsim for my sim. I use the simcommander.

    Gesendet von meinem GT-N8000 mit Tapatalk 2
  16. bsft

    bsft

    Balance:
    Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Sorry henning, my mistake
    And yes the new x-sim does handle drift.
    refer to the website www.x-sim.de
  17. james wheeler

    james wheeler Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2014
    Messages:
    185
    Balance:
    216Coins
    Ratings:
    +48 / 1 / -0
    My Motion Simulator:
    2DOF, Arduino
    Nice work. I am new to sim building and its comfortable to see so many people working together on suck a variety of projects. This design is the first I think I will try