1. Do not share user accounts! Any account that is shared by another person will be blocked and closed. This means: we will close not only the account that is shared, but also the main account of the user who uses another person's account. We have the ability to detect account sharing, so please do not try to cheat the system. This action will take place on 04/18/2023. Read all forum rules.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. For downloading SimTools plugins you need a Download Package. Get it with virtual coins that you receive for forum activity or Buy Download Package - We have a zero Spam tolerance so read our forum rules first.

    Buy Now a Download Plan!
  3. Do not try to cheat our system and do not post an unnecessary amount of useless posts only to earn credits here. We have a zero spam tolerance policy and this will cause a ban of your user account. Otherwise we wish you a pleasant stay here! Read the forum rules
  4. We have a few rules which you need to read and accept before posting anything here! Following these rules will keep the forum clean and your stay pleasant. Do not follow these rules can lead to permanent exclusion from this website: Read the forum rules.
    Are you a company? Read our company rules

Discussion & brainstorm topic: Reducing motor load

Discussion in 'DIY Motion Simulator Building Q&A / FAQ' started by floriske.nl, Apr 1, 2012.

  1. floriske.nl

    floriske.nl Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    142
    Occupation:
    Graphic Designer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Balance:
    27Coins
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1 / -0
    And suddenly the construction gets a lot more complicated for someone who has only a bench press with a cross table to his disposal ;)

    Sorry, but that's a bit out of my league ;)

    How about the option of using cylinders with a shorter stroke positioned half way the pivot and motors? 32mm bore with a 10mm rod at 7kg/cm² results in approx 50kg max if I'm correct.

    Edit: or I could use two of these (one for each cylinder) combined with u-joint

    [​IMG]

    But I'd have to be sure they have enough angle and it would add another $ 40 to the budget
  2. adgun

    adgun Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    519
    Occupation:
    mechanic
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Balance:
    5,690Coins
    Ratings:
    +131 / 4 / -0
    Sorry it's more easy for me in Dutch
    Hoi Floris ik weet niet precies wat je nu van plan bent,maar als je een dubbelwerkende cilinder aan 2 kanten wil vullen zonder expansievat.
    Dan zal de druk snel boven de maximaal toegestaane druk van 10 bar komen als je begint met een voordruk van 7 bar en sloop je de cilinder.
    Je hebt dan een cilinder met een veel langere slag nodig om buffer te maken.
    gr.Ad
  3. floriske.nl

    floriske.nl Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    142
    Occupation:
    Graphic Designer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Balance:
    27Coins
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1 / -0
    @ad: I already took that into account.

    You said that 18 degrees of angle (my platform's max) results in 1/5 of the total weight rests on the motors, in my case approx. 25kg.

    So at the lowest or highest position the pressure in a 32mm bore cylinder has to be approx 3,5kg/cm² to carry those 25 kg's completely. In which case the starting pressure will be a lot lower than 7kg/cm².

    The cylinders are 14cm longer than their stroke so I reckon they have a 5cm buffer on each side approx.

    P.s. Np on the dutch, some technical stuff simply is easier in your own language!
  4. floriske.nl

    floriske.nl Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    142
    Occupation:
    Graphic Designer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Balance:
    27Coins
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1 / -0
    For those who followed this topic:

    Since budgetwise it would cost more than I expected to do it right, I've decided to forget about cylinders for now and buy 4 adjustable trunk lid springs to see how much difference they make

    springs.jpg
    If my budget allows I might decide to go for 3DOF (with only a slight vertical travel of e.g.100mm to keep it compact) in the future in which case I'll start looking into cylinders some more.

    Thanks all that replied and shed some light on this topic, learned a lot from you so far!
  5. bsft

    bsft

    Balance:
    Coins
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Now those springs would be good. I will have a gawk around to see if I can find something locally.
    Cheers, David.
  6. floriske.nl

    floriske.nl Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    142
    Occupation:
    Graphic Designer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Balance:
    27Coins
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1 / -0
  7. floriske.nl

    floriske.nl Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2012
    Messages:
    142
    Occupation:
    Graphic Designer
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Balance:
    27Coins
    Ratings:
    +3 / 1 / -0
    For those interested: the springs arrived today:
    2012-05-03 14.30.09.jpg (the ruler is in cm/mm)

    They are a lot bigger and, more important, stronger than I thought. (I can barely stretch them by hand).

    So I reckon I have to place them closer to the pivot point than I intended.

    Since these are the plates my pivot will end up in between:
    [​IMG]
    (the steel plates are 30x30cm)

    I reckon I'll just place them in between the top and bottom adjustment rails.

    Edit: a quick calculation learns that at that point the springs have to stretch in and out approx 25 to 30mm (so 50 to 60mm in total). Guess I need to test it to see if they will.